It's reasons like this that I love New York. Challenging authority? Check. Blatant disregard for one's own physical well-being? Check. Humor? Check. Repeated use of rhetorical questions and "Check" as an answer in consecutive posts by same contributor? Check.
Happy Friday folks.
Friday, June 10, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
12 comments:
that is fantastic. and that old guy is quite a stuntman. he would make "hooper" proud.
that is fantastic. and that old guy is quite a stuntman. he would make "hooper" proud.
why does he always say "i got a ticket for riding NOT in the bike lane" versus "i got a ticket for not riding in the bike lane?" that bothers me. serves him right. prick.
Why does Simmons insist on similarly bad sentence structure?:
"But Burrows' biting Bergeron, then scoring a ridiculously creative goal to win Game 2?"
hey, we're not afraid to drop some bad sentence structure around here. glass houses, and all that.
the original bat mobile is parked outside our office...like...the adam west batmobile
Rephrase....copy of orig
i confess to being really, really impressed with grantland's first few days.
Rob's comment has made me go to grantlands and check it out.
Point of order: my ideas are terrible but my sentence structure would make Strunk and White proud.
Whenever I hear/see Grantland, I sing that word to the song Badlands.
The writing has indeed been strong out the box. The Champs League story and the Wrigley story were both great. And the Donnie Walsh one was good too.
this hockey game has been awesome
Post a Comment