Monday, January 20, 2014

Drug Week: A Very Special GTB Report

Welcome to Drug Week at G:TB, a nuanced and deeply researched* look into our nation's evolving and conflicted approach to the enforcement, legalization, and use of mind-altering substances. 

(* - It will be neither of those things. Hell, it's unlikely that we'll make it more than two days before collapsing in a weed and booze-addled lazy haze.)

Yesterday, @BadNewsHughes pointed out an amusing coincidence on Twitter, noting that both NFL conference championship games were played in states that have legalized recreational marijuana use. The Broncos were obviously the more relaxed team in their matchup with New England, and it's not hard to understand the reason. Seattle, interestingly, pressed throughout the first half against San Francisco, clear evidence of the long-standing irony of caffeine's widespread acceptance as a legal stimulant juxtaposed against pot's status as mellower non grata. The Emerald City's deep-rooted addiction to coffee-based kickstarts overcame Washington's recent legalization of marijuana until Pete Carroll passed a bowl around the Seahawks' locker room at halftime. Some habits die hard. Because they're subsidized and protected by governments.

More noteworthy this week (though somehow not really mentioned by the press at large), were President Barack Obama's comments on marijuana. While the President didn't come out for Federal legalization of recreational use, he did say something that I found at the same time controversial and true. In an interview with The New Yorker, Obama said, ""I smoked pot as a kid, and I view it as a bad habit and a vice, not very different from the cigarettes that I smoked as a young person up through a big chunk of my adult life. I don't think it is more dangerous than alcohol." (Emphasis ours.)

When I was in high school, long before I ever smoked pot (which I did just one time, and didn't like it, as far as my parents will ever know), I began a long-running argument with my father about the merits of marijuana legalization. I didn't have the benefit of the numerous studies comparing alcohol use and abuse to marijuana's negative societal impacts at my disposal. Instead, I had a kid's natural inclination to rebel against his parents and a teenager's highly refined bullshit/hypocrisy sensor. Meanwhile, Dad, who was a military officer and later a high school principal, argued from authority. And even today, I don't disagree with his points about negative influence on military and educational discipline - I just don't think pot's impact on those things is materially different than alcohol's.

Dad and I never settled anything, as you might guess, but it strikes me that the President's words today are meaningful in changing the terms of the debate. The Commander in Chief smoked pot as a young man (as did each of his last two predecessors). He's not advocating cannabis for all (pot in every pot, as it were) - in fact, he takes pains to classify weed as a bad thing - he's merely articulating an argument for equivalence with America's most widely accepted vice. Alcohol fucks us up immeasurably more than does marijuana, and it's propped up by a billion-dollar industry that spends more than $15 million a year (which actually seems low) on lobbying just the U.S. Congress - in no small part to ensure that marijuana doesn't get a Federal stamp of approval.

The President said something else that matters in changing the conversation about marijuana when he addressed the depressing and borderline criminal disparities in the enforcement of our current laws.  "Middle-class kids don't get locked up for smoking pot, and poor kids do," he said. "And African-American kids and Latino kids are more likely to be poor and less likely to have the resources and the support to avoid unduly harsh penalties."

According to the (clearly pro-legalization) Drug Policy Alliance, the quote-unquote War on Drugs costs us $51 billion/year. Legalization would yield an estimated $46.7 billion in tax revenues, assuming weed was taxed at comparable rates to alcohol and tobacco. That's a net benefit to the economy of nearly $97 billion, with immeasurable positive impacts in terms of lives no longer ruined by mandatory drug sentences, and a reduction in crime related to marijuana trafficking. 

But above all the economic and enforcement arguments, none strikes me as more compelling as the same one I made as a kid. It remains the height of hypocrisy to insist on public policy that treats alcohol as America's magical social lubricant while demonizing the use of cannabis. And I thank the President for agreeing with 16 year-old me. Somewhere, likely in a glorious hookah room in Heaven, my father probably grudgingly agrees. Even he could eventually be swayed by logic.

20 comments:

mayhugh said...

Question that I don't know the answer to and am too lazy to research: how does the decriminalization of marijuana impact the enforcement of other narcotics prohibitions?

rob said...

that's a great question, mayhugh, and i can't find a decent answer. one study suggests that marijuana enforcement alone represents 10% of u.s. law enforcement spending.

on a more important note, the today show stole this topic from us this morning. nice to know that they're readers.

Marls said...

Matt Lauer stole my haircut too. Fucking douchenozzle.

Danimal said...

Jiminy Christmas. With the radio geeks, fb posts, and twitter talk, I was expecting a far more outrageous post-game interview with Sherman (I went to bed early cuz, well, I'm lame).
Mark gets 1 for the Busta Rhymes comment.

zman said...

Isn't this the whole point of NAFTA? No?

Marls said...

Rocking day here at G:TB. Everybody must be off doing drugs.

Danimal said...

Drudge also reads GTB, or Mark's Twitter feed.

rob said...

tribe's rpi is a lofty 158. we're creeping up the ranks.

Dave said...

new freakonomics podcast on this topic. probably more financial benefits from legalizing crack and cocaine, if you are thinking like an economist.

here's a quote from the synopsis of the episode, because i am too laze to summarize:

Because I think when it comes to marijuana, the social costs of the prohibition of marijuana are just really low. Very few people in the United States are being killed over marijuana. The gangs are not making their money off marijuana. Marijuana in some very real sense is too cheap. It’s too easy to grow yourself and so it isn’t the source of all of the ills that come with prohibition. And so, so the gains of legalizing marijuana for society are much smaller than the gains would be to legalizing cocaine if you could control how the outcome came.

rob said...

ethan wragge has 24 points at halftime for creighton against villanova. he has not dribbled the ball. 8 catch and shoot triples. hoops is fun.

rob said...

that's a fair point from an economic perspective, but real societal benefits will accrue from increased revenues and elimination of the possibility of prison sentences for relatively minor offenses.

zman said...

Pot doesn't turn you into a crackhead.

zman said...

Ivanovic/Bouchard is another compelling matchup.

zman said...

Chris Evert's dress makes her look like she has giant irregularly shaped downward pointing nipples. Not a fly look.

zman said...

Chris Evert's dress makes her look like she has giant irregularly shaped downward pointing nipples. Not a fly look.

Clarence said...

Crack doesn't turn you into a pothead.

So I'm told.

zman said...

Bouchard is the real deal.

Clarence said...

Word on the street is that pot sales in the legalized states is cash only because no bank will support an industry that's federally illegal. And that creates huge problems.

But let the summit be in CO or WA.

Shlara said...

legalize it and tax it

zman said...

Don't criticize it.

Cliff Drysdale is the South African version of Ron Burgundy.