Trump said "United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine."
Zelenskyy replied "Yes you are absolutely right .... I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes."
Trump immediately replied "I would like you to do us a favor ..." and asked for Ukraine to look into CrowdStrike.
Zelenskyy's next words were "Yes it is very important for me and everything that you just mentioned earlier. For me as a President, it is very important and we are open for any future cooperation." He then said he's looking forward to seeing Rudy Giuliani.
Trump rambles for a sentence or two and then says "The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me."
Zelenskyy responds that "the next prosecutor general will be 100% my person, my candidate, who will be approved, by the parliament and will start as a new prosecutor in September. He or she will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue."
Trump replies "I will have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out."
Zelenskyy notes that he stayed in the Trump Tower the last time he visited New York City and adds that he "would like to thank you very much for your support."
Satisfied, Trump wraps things up with "Good. Well, thank you very much and I appreciate that. I will tell Rudy and Attorney General Barr to call. Thank you."
These guys just did a deal, right? In a nutshell, the first guy told the second guy that the second guy takes but doesn't give; the second guy offered to make it up to the first guy by "coooperating" to buy some stuff from him; the first guy asked for a favor; the second guy said yes and noted that he's open to "future cooperation"; the first guy asked for another favor; the second guy said he'd put someone on it right away; the first guy said his boys Rudy and Bob would be in touch to discuss next steps; they both thanked each other.
How is this not a quid pro quo exchange? More importantly, WHO THE FUCK CARES IF THIS IS A QUID PRO QUO EXCHANGE!?!?!? THIS IS FUCKING COLLUSION OR CONSPIRACY OR COOPERATION OR WHATEVER ELSE YOU WANT TO CALL IT!!!
Robert Mueller and his team spend close to two years investigating Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election. He was not looking for "quid pro quo," he was looking for "coordination" between the Russian government and the Trump campaign. I know this because page 2 of the Mueller Report says "we addressed the factual question whether members of the Trump Campaign 'coordinat[ed]'—a term that appears in the appointment order—with Russian election interference activities." Page 2 of the Mueller Report notes that "[l]ike collusion, 'coordination' does not have a settled definition in federal criminal law. We understood coordination to require an agreement—tacit or express—between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference."
Isn't that exactly what Trump and Zelenskyy did? They tacitly agreed to interfere with the upcoming 2020 Presidential election, right? Why isn't anyone saying this? Why is everyone debating "quid pro quo"? You mean to tell me that if Mueller found a tape recording of a phone call between Trump and Putin saying what I outlined above, Mueller still would have concluded that there was no "cooperation" between Trump and Russia? If you're telling me that, please pass me whatever you're drinking.
The Mueller Report also analyzed the facts under the rubric of conspiracy, applying 18 U.S.C. § 371 and statutes with similar standards. Mueller Report at 181. The elements of conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371 are:
(1) Two or more persons
(2) conspire (i.e., intentionally agree--you can't have a conspiracy between a criminal and an undercover cop because the cop doesn't really intend to commit the crime)
(3) to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and
(4) one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy
Trump's call with Zelenskyy had two people. Element 1, check. They intentionally agreed to do something, namely to investigate CrowdStrike and Biden. Element 2, check. Trump hopes that investigating Biden will result in information adverse to his political rival, so he's asking a foreign government to provide information that will influence the next election. Element 3, check (see 52 U.S.C. § 30121(a)(1)(C); United States v. Renzi, 769 F.3d 731, 744 (9th Cir. 2014)). So long as Zelenskyy took a single step towards investigating Biden, we have element 4 and thus a conspiracy.
I just explained this in under 1000 words (987 to be exact) and I could definitely pare it down if I wasn't lazy. Why doesn't anyone else with a bigger platform point this out? Probably because DJ Trump Jedi mind tricked everyone again, and has us all talking about quids and pros. To paraphrase KRS-ONE, I encourage you to wake up, take the pillow from your head and put a book in it. Or at least a few statutes.