At the time of posting, we're fewer than 36 hours away from the start of a new Premier League season. One of the league's traditional preseason activities (in addition to exhibition games/money grabs in places far from the UK and Chelsea overpaying for middling talent) is the release of new kit designs. Which, come to think of it, is also a money grab.
ESPN has helpfully catalogued and ranked all of this season's new looks so you can judge their relative attractiveness (or lack thereof) for yourselves. But we're here to serve, so if you don't have that much time, allow us to tell you what's Good, Meh, and Ugly.
The Good
Sunderland were surprisingly frisky last season after being promoted from the Championship. The Black Cats took some major scalps early in the campaign, and wound up in 7th place, good for a Europa League spot. They celebrated by dropping a pair of sweet kits:
ESPN ranks their away kit as the very best of the new season's offerings. I like it, too.
The Meh
Adidas has done this thing recently where they leave a cap in the three stripes markings that run down the sleeves, probably to fit in more sponsorship logos. Let us go on record as disliking it - see Fulham's fairly unambitious home kit as an example of the form:
Chelsea is a mess in a lot of ways (though I expect them to be pretty competitive on the pitch under new manager Xabi Alonso). Their home kit design seems to be a complete afterthought.
A bunch of clubs, including the aforementioned Fulham, are basically running back the same home kits they've used for a while now. So don't expect anything interesting from Arsenal, Spurs, Manchester United, Bournemouth, and several others.
Everton is a blue club, just like Chelsea, and they didn't break any new ground, either, but I do like the little splash of yellow on the collar.
The Ugly
With due respect to our man Marls, Newcastle's home kit is a nice try, but a bizarre execution:
Hull City is newly promoted. Let's hope they play better than they design kits.
I generally like Leeds United's kits, but someone should've thought about how this season's home kit would look when the sponsor's logo was applied:
And finally, for good reason, Spurs seem to understand that their home kit is fairly standard, so they went for it with their away togs. They should not have done so.












Meanwhile, Leicester City is wearing Hanes beefy T's with an "L" written on them in Sharpie, languishing in English football doldrumville.
ReplyDeleteyeah - kinda meh: https://shop.lcfc.com/en/leicester-city-men-s-home-shirt-2026-27-adults
ReplyDeleteif you have a moment, go find the video of the brothers sullivan (quinn and cavan) of the philadelphia union getting into a scrap with members of fc miami last night. quinn bodyslammed an opponent and cavan (who's 16 years old) got into it with a much older/larger dude. brotherly love, indeed.
ReplyDeleteThe Newcastle kits are a disaster, much like their efforts during the transfer window.
ReplyDeletei thought gheorghe's stance on fashion was this: it's dumb.
ReplyDeletewe are still at the beach, and apparently two blocks away from the premier soccer bar in new jersey (D'Arcy's Tavern). so i guess i should go on saturday-- at what time? i know they're open all kinds of weird hours . . ..
looks like 10 am. who am i rooting for? give me some vested interest . . .
ReplyDeleteyou should wait until 1230 and head there for lunch and beers while you watch your brentford take on spurs. who am i rooting for? fucking hell.
ReplyDeletebrentford bees! that's my team!
ReplyDeletebees, baby!
ReplyDeleteWatching college football conferences, coaches, and administrators twist themselves into knots trying to justify their latest positions is just too delicious for words.
ReplyDeletewhich fuckery do you refer to in this case?
ReplyDeletetribe men's soccer blew two separate two-goal leads and lost, 6-5, to longwood (yikes). somewhere rezvan is nursing a scotch and muttering under his breath.
ReplyDeleteYou can't stop Longwood. They're a juggernaut.
ReplyDelete