Monday, April 04, 2016

Daughters of Anarchy

We welcome back our favorite purveyor of footie features, Fat Guy in a Speedo, who eschews the incredible story playing out at the top of the Premier League for major news closer to home. We find ourselves agreeing in full with the move recently made by the best national side in the US of A.

This week four highly respected players of the U.S. Women’s National Team and Hope Solo filed a wage discrimination lawsuit against U.S. Soccer, the governing body in ‘M(m?)erica. The women argue that while representing the country on the pitch they earn roughly 40% of what the men garner despite the fact they are vastly more successful. U.S. Soccer argues that the men generate more revenue though attendance and TV rights and testicular acreage (Ed Note: U.S. Soccer may argue this, but they've got a bigger issue here. The governing body's own data suggests that the distaff Nats will actually generate more profit over the next two years than their counterparts with external genitalia). Two plausibly reasonable arguments that might result in a bit of a shitstorm given the way the payscales of the two teams are vastly different. 

In addition to qualifiers, both teams are obligated to play 20 exhibition “friendlies” per year for which the women are paid a base of $72,000 and a $1,350 bonus if they win. The men are guaranteed $5,000 and bonuses up to $8,000 for a win depending on the rank of their opponents. If the men beat Spain or Germany they make $18,156 while the women would make $4,950 for a similar victory. In other words, if the women win all 20 international friendlies they take home $99,000, if the men lose all 20 they take home $100,000. The women argue similar disparities in pay for competition play and even note a per diem discrepancy for national  ($50 women/$62.50 men) and international duties ($60w/75m). 

U.S. Soccer contends that the women collectively bargained for and approved this payout scale. The suit stems from the fact that this agreement expired in 2012 and U.S. Soccer contends a 2013 MOU extended it to which the union disagrees. I’m not a lawyer although I play one on two of my resumes and this case raises a number of financial, social and ethical questions. A few that come to mind:

Why would U.S. Soccer structure such disparate payscales for each team?

Is it true that the per diem discrepancy is because the men need to eat more food?

Do the U.S. Paralympic soccer teams have even lower per diems since they ostensibly require even less nutrition than the USMNT and USWNT?

Who are Rory and Joey Feek and why is my news feed continually spammed since one of them died?

Given that soccer is the only major sport in the U.S. where the men and women’s team each has a dedicated fan base (USWNT averages 12K attendees per game versus men’s 28K) does U.S. Soccer have any obligation to structure pay equality based on performance? Women’s soccer is relatively new with fewer teams, since it’s inception in 1991 the U.S. women have won three World Cups. The men are average at best and never will win the big Cup (Ed Note: Never is a long time. We made the quarters as recently as X years ago. I bet we win one in the lifetime of at least one of us.). As a biased fan of the women’s team I say, “give ‘em hell girls!” But seriously, some of the top sports headlines of 2015 included the USWNT, Serena Williams and Ronda Rousey. Equal pay for equal work and play might make us look a tad less troglodytic to future generations.


In case my wife stumbles upon this blog I think a handy is in order by someone other than yours truly.

26 comments:

  1. Buckles informs me that this month's Specialty Cocktail featured at the palm will be an Apple Blossom. You like apples blossoms?

    ReplyDelete
  2. that got some applejack in it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. My money is on Kessler getting the win for the USWNT

    ReplyDelete
  4. i'm no lawyer, but us soccer doesn't really seem to have a strong position here

    ReplyDelete
  5. men DO need to eat more food, but aside from that, i don't think the guys have a (third) leg to stand on.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ron Darling in the WSJ today---wow:
    http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-drugs-and-alcohol-fueled-the-1986-mets-1459795793?mod=e2tw

    ReplyDelete
  7. More interesting reading for the Gheorghies. This time, from The Atlantic:

    "We wouldn't dream of walking into Whole Foods and stealing. But that part of people's ethical behavior turns off when they go online and they find free porn. Watching free porn is the equivalent of walking into the grocery store and walking out with food that you're not paying for."

    http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/04/pornography-industry-economics-tarrant/476580/

    ReplyDelete
  8. i had no idea shlara had such a dirty mind

    ReplyDelete
  9. That was unreal. The game was great before the final two shots. Those shots might make it the best NCAA Tournament Championship game ever. Wow. Wow. Wow.

    ReplyDelete
  10. So I should've watched the game instead of catching up on the OJ series?

    ReplyDelete
  11. If I fell asleep at halftime, I didn't miss anything, did I?

    ReplyDelete
  12. pretty glad i stayed awake for the whole thing. that was incredible. at halftime, i was convinced that carolina had too much for nova.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Did you know this existed? How did I not know this existed??
    http://tinyurl.com/zbjm4or

    ReplyDelete
  14. I hate Comcast with the heat of 1,000 suns

    ReplyDelete
  15. Because they won't carry the YES network? They're still much better than Time Warner.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The game really was amazing! And while my bracket was a mess, I had this final game and Villanova winning. Lucky I guess. It was something! Hope y'all are enjoying the return of Winter...wth?!

    ReplyDelete
  17. uconn's ladies are giving cuse no quarter

    ReplyDelete
  18. Was she like "Hope Solo's legs though!"?

    ReplyDelete